How Much Does Meghan Markle Weigh? 2025 Answer with Sources, Ranges, and Context

TL;DR

• No verified, current number exists for Meghan Markle’s weight as of September 2025.
• Entertainment profiles have long estimated roughly 56-61 kg (about 123-135 lb), most commonly 56-57 kg from her pre-royal acting years.
• She hasn’t publicly disclosed an official figure; values online are estimates or recycled guesses.
• Given her height (~1.68 m/5'6"), those figures would place BMI in the ~19.9-21.6 range-context, not a diagnosis.
• Below: sources, reliability, a quick fact-check method, and a simple way to quote this without spreading misinformation.

What’s the most reliable answer right now?

If you clicked hoping for one neat number, here’s the straight, evidence-backed answer: Meghan Markle has not released an official, current weight. The most repeated online figure comes from old entertainment profiles during her Suits era, usually listing about 56-57 kg (roughly 124-126 lb). Those numbers are not verified by her and may not reflect today.

So what’s fair to say in 2025? A reasonable, sourced way to frame it is: public listings have long estimated her at around 56-61 kg (123-135 lb), with the lower end (56-57 kg) appearing repeatedly in pre-2018 entertainment databases. She’s since had two pregnancies (2019 and 2021), and like anyone, weight changes over time. There’s no current official disclosure.

If you’re writing or speaking about it, the ethical, accurate phrasing is something like: “There’s no verified 2025 number for Meghan Markle weight. Older entertainment profiles commonly cited ~56-57 kg from her acting years; estimates online now range roughly 56-61 kg, but she hasn’t confirmed a figure.” That sets expectations, signals uncertainty, and avoids passing off guesses as facts.

Why is there no hard data? Public figures sometimes share height, very rarely share weight, and almost never keep it updated. Media outlets often copy one another, so a single unverified number can echo for years.

Need context beyond the number? Meghan is frequently reported at about 1.68 m (5'6"). If you map estimated weights to that height, BMI lands roughly in the high-19s to low-22s, which is a wide, normal range. BMI is only context-not a health verdict.

Sources, ranges, and why numbers vary

Where do the figures you see online actually come from? Mostly from:

• Old press or entertainment profiles (compiled during her Suits years)
• Talent/entertainment databases and fan sites (often unsourced or crowdsourced)
• Tabloids reprinting the same lines for years

What they share: they’re not first-party. There’s no recent on-record quote from Meghan or an official representative stating a specific, current number. That’s why you’ll see small variations across sites.

Here’s a snapshot of what’s been reported over time and how to interpret it:

A quick reality check: when a single number appears across dozens of sites, it often traces back to one early listing that everyone copied. Unless there’s a dated, first-party quote, treat it as an estimate, not a fact.

What about height? Multiple outlets have consistently given ~1.68 m (5'6"). Height is easier to verify from live events and wardrobe details, and it doesn’t swing with life stages the way body weight can. That said, even height gets rounded.

Pregnancy and postpartum matter too. Meghan welcomed Archie in 2019 and Lilibet in 2021. Weight changes across those years are normal, healthy, and expected-another reason to be cautious about any “fixed” figure offered as if it were current.

She’s talked more about lifestyle than numbers. In pre-royal interviews with mainstream outlets (for example, wellness chats around 2015-2017), she highlighted yoga and Pilates, a plant-forward diet, and balance rather than strictness. That gives a sense of habits, not a measurement.

Context: height, BMI, and how to spot bad info

If you want to put the common estimates into context, here’s the simple math. At approximately 1.68 m (5'6"):

• 56 kg ⇒ BMI ≈ 19.9
• 57 kg ⇒ BMI ≈ 20.2
• 60 kg ⇒ BMI ≈ 21.3
• 61 kg ⇒ BMI ≈ 21.6
• 63 kg ⇒ BMI ≈ 22.3

That range sits comfortably within what’s typically considered a normal BMI for adults. BMI isn’t a health assessment-and it says nothing about strength, muscle, or well-being-but it can help you picture how different weights relate to a given height.

Now, if your job is to state a number (you’re writing a caption, script, or school project), the goal is to be clear and responsible. Use this quick, practical method.

Step-by-step: how to fact-check a celebrity weight claim

1. Look for first-party disclosure. Has Meghan or her spokesperson ever said a number on record? If not, say so.
2. Check date stamps. If a figure is from 2016, don’t present it as 2025. Add the time context.
3. Cross-compare at least three independent sources. If all three cite each other, you still have only one unverified claim.
4. Prefer ranges for dynamic traits. For weight, use a historically documented range, not a single “today” number with no source.
5. Write with transparency. Example: “No verified 2025 figure; earlier entertainment profiles commonly listed ~56-57 kg.”

Rules of thumb to avoid being misled

• A solitary, very precise number (e.g., “58.06 kg”) is a red flag unless it’s from medical or sports testing-and public figures rarely release that.
• Tables that list “height/weight/measurements” without citations are usually scraped or fan-edited.
• Photos are not evidence of exact weight. Lighting, tailoring, and posture can change how a body looks within the same week.
• Pregnancy timelines matter. If the figure ignores major life events, it’s probably outdated.

How to quote this responsibly (plug-and-play lines)

• Short: “There’s no verified current number for Meghan Markle’s weight.”
• With range: “Older entertainment profiles commonly listed ~56-57 kg; estimates online now span roughly 56-61 kg, unconfirmed.”
• With context: “At about 1.68 m, that range equates to a BMI roughly ~20-22, but she hasn’t disclosed a current figure.”

Common pitfalls when covering celebrity weight

• Presenting an old number as current without a date
• Using an exact figure from a tabloid headline as if it were verified
• Ignoring uncertainty (writing “is” instead of “was listed as” or “has been estimated at”)
• Implying health conclusions from a single number

If you want more context, here are likely follow-up questions-with direct answers.

Q: So, what’s the best single sentence answer?
“Meghan Markle hasn’t shared a verified current weight; older entertainment profiles often listed ~56-57 kg (124-126 lb), but modern estimates vary and remain unconfirmed.”

Q: Why do so many sites say the same number?
Because they’ve copied a legacy listing from the Suits years. Once one figure appears in a database, it spreads-and rarely gets updated.

Q: Is there any official 2025 figure?
No. There’s no recent first-party source from Meghan or her representatives giving a specific weight.

Q: Can I estimate from photos?
You can guess, but it won’t be reliable. Clothing structure, camera angles, and posture make a bigger difference than most people think.

Q: What about height-how confident is 1.68 m (5'6")?
That’s the most consistent figure across mainstream coverage, red-carpet references, and wardrobe notes. Still, even height gets rounded in print.

Q: Does BMI tell us anything useful here?
It helps visualize weight relative to height, but it isn’t a health diagnosis. Two people can share a BMI and have very different builds and fitness levels.

Quick checklist: use this before you hit publish

• Do I clearly state there’s no verified current number?
• Did I time-stamp any figure I included (e.g., “pre-2018 profiles”)?
• Did I avoid passing off estimates as facts?
• Did I add context (height, range, and uncertainty) instead of a single rigid number?
• Did I steer clear of health claims?

Next steps and scenarios

• For journalists: Attribute the range and state the lack of a current official number. Example: “No verified 2025 figure; historic listings around 56-57 kg.” This protects your credibility and your outlet.
• For students: If your assignment requires a number, use a dated estimate and cite its type (e.g., “entertainment database listing from pre-2018”). Add a note on uncertainty.
• For fans: If you’re just curious, know that most numbers online are recycled. The honest answer is “not publicly confirmed.”
• For brand/PR copy: Avoid a number. Lean into lifestyle descriptors that are on record (yoga, Pilates, running) without speculating.

One last practical tip: when you see a number, ask two questions-“Who said this?” and “When?” If you can’t answer both, treat it as a ballpark estimate and say so. That simple habit is the cleanest way to be accurate, fair, and kind.